Wednesday, December 28, 2016
False Change
To those who see Donald Trump as an agent of change let me remind you that surrounding oneself with segregationists to administer justice, climate deniers to protect the environment, military generals to promote peace, unqualified people to oversee urban development, anti-public school advocates to direct educational policy, and the corporate head of the world's largest petroleum company to manifest un-conflicted statesmanship around the world does not represent real change but rather the painful extension and vulgar expression of the dying culture of unchecked greed and uncontrolled consumption. As you bask in the rays of this setting sun, also know that soon a new dawn will fill the horizon reflective of an emerging, fully engaged, and forward looking majority of hopeful and active citizens.
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
Winter Thoughts
The winter solstice offers the perfect metaphor for hope and renewal. As the longest and darkest night concludes, it is immediately followed by the return of the light. What seemed to be the depths of despair gradually yields to the advent of renewed hope. So, too, when perhaps we gaze upon a darkened horizon, we also can be lifted by the promise of a sky soon to be alighted with infinite possibilities.
Friday, December 16, 2016
Obama's Lost Opportunity
As the Electoral College is set to decide whether to ratify the results of November's presidential election, let's take a moment to reflect upon the outgoing administration and the Obama legacy.
The principle accomplishments of the Obama's presidency are certain to revolve around his role in the recovery of an economy which was teetering on the brink of total collapse, the subsequent reduction in the unemployment rate, and the enactment of the Affordable Care Act which provided health insurance to millions of previously uninsured Americans thereby reducing the overall net cost of healthcare. While these fetes are laudable and noteworthy, a closer look at the totality of these past eight years reveals more disappointment and lost opportunity than accomplishment as the chief characteristic of this political era.
In the wake of the Bush/Chaney years, it was the hope (indeed, the promise) of the new administration to address some of the misdeeds, questionable decisions, and excesses of its predecessor. First on the list of remedial actions was the closing of the detention center in Guantanamo Bay which had held prisoners, without charge, for years many of whom were originally apprehended for bounty in their native countries with no connection to terrorism whatsoever. Instead of processing these cases through either civilian or even military judicial procedures, Obama allowed this facility to continue to function thereby, in effect, ratifying the illegal incarceration of individuals without the due process of law.
Obama's next opportunity at rectification of past ill-conceived policy was with respect to the so-called 'war on terror' originally launched in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and fueled by various hasty measures including but not restricted to the illegal invasion of Iraq (in violation of the UN Security Council Charter) as well as the enactment of the Patriot Act which expanded the government's ability to collect information on otherwise innocent American citizens. Instead of ending this seemingly endless war effort, Obama altered its character by focusing on the use of weaponized drones as well as the covert action of elite special operations personnel in lieu of increased ground forces in a now enlarged war campaign. This new program also yielded the use of extra-judicial assassination as a matter of official US foreign policy, clearly on display in the drone-induced murder of American citizen Anwar al Awlaki and, later, his sixteen year old son Abdulrahman as well as the much celebrated assassination of Osama Bin Laden. This policy became so commonplace that Obama's 'kill list' and his Tuesday morning review of same was a matter of everyday conversation as an element of the status quo. Obama's expansion of the Bush/Chaney policy regarding the suppression of dissent was evidenced by the invocation of the Espionage Act at an unprecedented rate in the effort to quiet the voices of whistleblowers and journalists alike as they sought to expose governmental and military excess, overreach, and wrongdoing. The cases of Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, John Kiriakou, Edward Snowden, and Thomas Drake are testimony to early and current efforts at silencing dissent first initiated by Bush/Chaney and faithfully continued (if not expanded) under Obama.
In all of the above cited examples, the Obama administration had the opportunity to right a previous wrong, correct an errant policy decision, and thereby change the course of direction in favor an arc
toward reconciliation and justice and, instead, chose either to stay the course outlined by the previous regime or, in fact, up the ante in terms of the proliferation of the original mistake.
Perhaps the biggest disappointment of the Obama years, however, was the lost opportunity to open a serious and potentially healing dialogue on the subject of race in America. The mere mention of race in certain quarters elicits cries of 'asserting the race card' as a way to inhibit and bring to an end any further exploration into this vital issue. I will, once again, remind my brethren that the race card has been in play in America from the original exploitation and eventual genocide of its native population, through the ugly and brutal institution of slavery, the subsequent era of Jim Crow exclusion and savagery, and into the modern day denial of equal access to quality education, entry into vital institutions, and the fair administration of justice. Unlike the aforementioned examples of lost opportunity, the failure to advance a meaningful national dialogue on race cannot be properly laid on Obama's doorstep. One need only look back on the Tavon Martin murder as evidence of both the promise of dialogue and the subsequent denial and avoidance of the matter altogether. When news of Tavon's killing became known throughout the country, President Obama made a national, prime time appeal to the American people by courageously opening his heart and sharing his experience as a black man growing up in a country often hostile to his presence based solely on the color of his skin. He famously declared that 'Tavon could have been me'. With this one statement, Obama was issuing an invitation to the inhabitants of this great country to open their eyes and their hearts to an experience known only too well by him and to empathically share it through his eyes in order to better understand the daily reality of the millions of kids, just like Tavon Martin, who must tread cautiously through a fearful landscape not of their own making. I was struck by the sincerity of Obama's implicit appeal, through the revelation of his perception as a black individual, to open a truly heartfelt and meaningful conversation on race and the real experience of being a person of color in modern day America. Instead of an embrace of this potentially pivotal moment, his announcement was met variously with suspicion, derision, anger, placation, denial, and indifference. An opportunity of groundbreaking dialogue and real communication on a national level was lost in the moment of so much promise resulting in a heartbreaking occasion. In its place, we resorted to our default position of denial, obfuscation, and resistance to the difficult task of healing a centuries old national wound. The presence of Barack Obama as our leader gave a never before seen chance to engage in a process of repair and renewal; a chance not likely to be revisited in the next four years. The conversation will, however, continue in the classrooms, clubs, multicultural organizations, churches, and in all the places where Obama's original promise will be kept, nurtured, and transformed in the hope-filled days to come.
The principle accomplishments of the Obama's presidency are certain to revolve around his role in the recovery of an economy which was teetering on the brink of total collapse, the subsequent reduction in the unemployment rate, and the enactment of the Affordable Care Act which provided health insurance to millions of previously uninsured Americans thereby reducing the overall net cost of healthcare. While these fetes are laudable and noteworthy, a closer look at the totality of these past eight years reveals more disappointment and lost opportunity than accomplishment as the chief characteristic of this political era.
In the wake of the Bush/Chaney years, it was the hope (indeed, the promise) of the new administration to address some of the misdeeds, questionable decisions, and excesses of its predecessor. First on the list of remedial actions was the closing of the detention center in Guantanamo Bay which had held prisoners, without charge, for years many of whom were originally apprehended for bounty in their native countries with no connection to terrorism whatsoever. Instead of processing these cases through either civilian or even military judicial procedures, Obama allowed this facility to continue to function thereby, in effect, ratifying the illegal incarceration of individuals without the due process of law.
Another blight on the national record during the Bush/Chaney regime was the authorization of torture (euphemistically referred to as 'enhanced interrogation'), first brought to light through the revelation of its practice at Abu Ghraib Prison in Afghanistan and later shown to be widespread throughout the world at various 'black sites' (including Guantanamo Bay) in countries where human rights
restrictions were, at best, relaxed. The sanctioning of this unprecedented use of torture under theauspices of American authority was directly attributable to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and perhaps even higher within the administration. An essential element in rectifying a past wrong or, in this case, a violation of international law is to duly prosecute all of the perpetrators, especially those directing the transgression from a position of high office. Obama had the opportunity to do this but chose to 'look ahead and not behind' when confronted with the decision.Obama's next opportunity at rectification of past ill-conceived policy was with respect to the so-called 'war on terror' originally launched in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and fueled by various hasty measures including but not restricted to the illegal invasion of Iraq (in violation of the UN Security Council Charter) as well as the enactment of the Patriot Act which expanded the government's ability to collect information on otherwise innocent American citizens. Instead of ending this seemingly endless war effort, Obama altered its character by focusing on the use of weaponized drones as well as the covert action of elite special operations personnel in lieu of increased ground forces in a now enlarged war campaign. This new program also yielded the use of extra-judicial assassination as a matter of official US foreign policy, clearly on display in the drone-induced murder of American citizen Anwar al Awlaki and, later, his sixteen year old son Abdulrahman as well as the much celebrated assassination of Osama Bin Laden. This policy became so commonplace that Obama's 'kill list' and his Tuesday morning review of same was a matter of everyday conversation as an element of the status quo. Obama's expansion of the Bush/Chaney policy regarding the suppression of dissent was evidenced by the invocation of the Espionage Act at an unprecedented rate in the effort to quiet the voices of whistleblowers and journalists alike as they sought to expose governmental and military excess, overreach, and wrongdoing. The cases of Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, John Kiriakou, Edward Snowden, and Thomas Drake are testimony to early and current efforts at silencing dissent first initiated by Bush/Chaney and faithfully continued (if not expanded) under Obama.
In all of the above cited examples, the Obama administration had the opportunity to right a previous wrong, correct an errant policy decision, and thereby change the course of direction in favor an arc
toward reconciliation and justice and, instead, chose either to stay the course outlined by the previous regime or, in fact, up the ante in terms of the proliferation of the original mistake.
Perhaps the biggest disappointment of the Obama years, however, was the lost opportunity to open a serious and potentially healing dialogue on the subject of race in America. The mere mention of race in certain quarters elicits cries of 'asserting the race card' as a way to inhibit and bring to an end any further exploration into this vital issue. I will, once again, remind my brethren that the race card has been in play in America from the original exploitation and eventual genocide of its native population, through the ugly and brutal institution of slavery, the subsequent era of Jim Crow exclusion and savagery, and into the modern day denial of equal access to quality education, entry into vital institutions, and the fair administration of justice. Unlike the aforementioned examples of lost opportunity, the failure to advance a meaningful national dialogue on race cannot be properly laid on Obama's doorstep. One need only look back on the Tavon Martin murder as evidence of both the promise of dialogue and the subsequent denial and avoidance of the matter altogether. When news of Tavon's killing became known throughout the country, President Obama made a national, prime time appeal to the American people by courageously opening his heart and sharing his experience as a black man growing up in a country often hostile to his presence based solely on the color of his skin. He famously declared that 'Tavon could have been me'. With this one statement, Obama was issuing an invitation to the inhabitants of this great country to open their eyes and their hearts to an experience known only too well by him and to empathically share it through his eyes in order to better understand the daily reality of the millions of kids, just like Tavon Martin, who must tread cautiously through a fearful landscape not of their own making. I was struck by the sincerity of Obama's implicit appeal, through the revelation of his perception as a black individual, to open a truly heartfelt and meaningful conversation on race and the real experience of being a person of color in modern day America. Instead of an embrace of this potentially pivotal moment, his announcement was met variously with suspicion, derision, anger, placation, denial, and indifference. An opportunity of groundbreaking dialogue and real communication on a national level was lost in the moment of so much promise resulting in a heartbreaking occasion. In its place, we resorted to our default position of denial, obfuscation, and resistance to the difficult task of healing a centuries old national wound. The presence of Barack Obama as our leader gave a never before seen chance to engage in a process of repair and renewal; a chance not likely to be revisited in the next four years. The conversation will, however, continue in the classrooms, clubs, multicultural organizations, churches, and in all the places where Obama's original promise will be kept, nurtured, and transformed in the hope-filled days to come.
Thursday, December 1, 2016
The Election of Trump, Protest, and the Way Forward
It has been suggested, rather sarcastically, that we treat President-Elect Trump with the same degree of respect and cooperation that has been shown President Obama during the past four years. My initial emotional reaction to this is to agree wholeheartedly while almost immediately asking myself what are the residual consequences of responding in kind apart from the very transitory satisfaction of revenge. Perhaps a better response would be the continual positing of an alternative model of behavior by which we all might benefit.
As we enter what will surely be, in some respects, a very dark time in our history, a guiding light may be shown as we exhibit and embody the values and mode of being that we envision for the future. In response to the negative reaction in the wake the popular uprising throughout the nation by the peaceful protests of millions of outraged American citizens, I would suggest that this is a clear manifestation of the value of free expression in a democratic context. Indeed it is the duty of responsible citizenship to respectfully stand in opposition to policies and decisions antithetical to core values and the best interests of the global population. These spontaneous expressions are sending the unmistakable message that the election of Trump, a vile, contemptible, potentially dangerous, and radically extreme individual, is profoundly unacceptable. In addition to clearly stating opposition, we must not, at the same time, actively subvert the new administration in the manner that Mitch McConnell and the Republican flock attempted to do during the Obama years by relentlessly working to undermine his success but rather actively assert alternative answers to the questions of the day and to do so with an intention which is at once inclusive, respectful, incisive, and mindful of the future well being of our country and the world of which America is merely a part.
As we enter what will surely be, in some respects, a very dark time in our history, a guiding light may be shown as we exhibit and embody the values and mode of being that we envision for the future. In response to the negative reaction in the wake the popular uprising throughout the nation by the peaceful protests of millions of outraged American citizens, I would suggest that this is a clear manifestation of the value of free expression in a democratic context. Indeed it is the duty of responsible citizenship to respectfully stand in opposition to policies and decisions antithetical to core values and the best interests of the global population. These spontaneous expressions are sending the unmistakable message that the election of Trump, a vile, contemptible, potentially dangerous, and radically extreme individual, is profoundly unacceptable. In addition to clearly stating opposition, we must not, at the same time, actively subvert the new administration in the manner that Mitch McConnell and the Republican flock attempted to do during the Obama years by relentlessly working to undermine his success but rather actively assert alternative answers to the questions of the day and to do so with an intention which is at once inclusive, respectful, incisive, and mindful of the future well being of our country and the world of which America is merely a part.
Reflections On The Yuletide Season
Recently, an old friend expressed to me her displeasure with the use of the term 'Happy Holidays' instead of the more familiar 'Merry Christmas' invocation. The following is my heartfelt response to her concern and to all those who are plagued with what they might consider to be the imposition of an inordinate amount of 'political correctness' during this festive season.
In the wonderful multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and multi-religious country of the United States of America it will be 'Merry Christmas' for some and 'Happy Holidays' for others. Let's start embracing the concept of 'both/and' and stop thinking in terms of 'either/or'. The values of respect for diversity, genuine inclusiveness, and acceptance of our naturally evolving human landscape gives us all the opportunity to joyfully embrace the entire American family. The December holiday season is celebrated in a variety of ways, especially as we, as a nation, are becoming more diverse. Another aspect to consider is the value of opening our collective, Christian hearts to recognize and appreciate the richness of our different attitudes, customs, and ways in which we all honor the Divine. To do so is not an expression of political correctness but rather an expression of compassion, love, and our common humanity. I honor my Christian roots by joyfully celebrating the birth of one of the greatest prophets the world has ever seen and happily declare 'Merry Christmas'. While I don't especially like the idea of X-ing out 'Christ' with the rather insipid pronouncement of 'Merry/Happy Xmas', I also appreciate and recognize the wide range of spiritual traditions better expressed by a simple wish of 'happy holidays'. One does not preclude the validity or existence of the other. Again, it's a 'both/and' proposition. I have a strong feeling that JC would want it that way!
In the wonderful multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and multi-religious country of the United States of America it will be 'Merry Christmas' for some and 'Happy Holidays' for others. Let's start embracing the concept of 'both/and' and stop thinking in terms of 'either/or'. The values of respect for diversity, genuine inclusiveness, and acceptance of our naturally evolving human landscape gives us all the opportunity to joyfully embrace the entire American family. The December holiday season is celebrated in a variety of ways, especially as we, as a nation, are becoming more diverse. Another aspect to consider is the value of opening our collective, Christian hearts to recognize and appreciate the richness of our different attitudes, customs, and ways in which we all honor the Divine. To do so is not an expression of political correctness but rather an expression of compassion, love, and our common humanity. I honor my Christian roots by joyfully celebrating the birth of one of the greatest prophets the world has ever seen and happily declare 'Merry Christmas'. While I don't especially like the idea of X-ing out 'Christ' with the rather insipid pronouncement of 'Merry/Happy Xmas', I also appreciate and recognize the wide range of spiritual traditions better expressed by a simple wish of 'happy holidays'. One does not preclude the validity or existence of the other. Again, it's a 'both/and' proposition. I have a strong feeling that JC would want it that way!
Monday, November 14, 2016
The Fate of the Democratic Party
The battle lines for the mind and soul of the Democratic Party going forward just got a lot clearer today. Rep. Keith Ellison just announced his candidacy for the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee. Together with Howard Dean, these two candidates present unambiguous choices in terms of the future direction of the party. Dean, a staunch supporter of HRC and a former chairperson of the DNC has been a consistent voice for the mainstream, centrist policies which have characterized the Democratic Party for the past four decades. Ellison, a Sanders supporter and the first Muslim in congress, has been a vocal and eloquent spokesman for progressive ideas and policies for the past 10 years and was recently named by Sanders to consult with the DNC in order to help shape the Democratic platform in this year's election by providing alternatives to the party's past penchant for maintaining the status quo.
The choice could not have been made more clear: more of the same as represented by Dean or the beginnings of a new move forward as will be championed by Ellison. The millions of supporters of the real change promised by the Sanders' candidacy were largely disenfranchised by the DNC's stubborn insistence on clinging to a 'safe' course by nominating HRC. It now has been presented with the opportunity to correct this massive error of judgement and embrace a new wave of progressive activism and, in so doing, reshape the Democratic Party into an institution which more accurately reflects the will of an emerging, positive, forward thinking, and hopeful electorate.
The choice could not have been made more clear: more of the same as represented by Dean or the beginnings of a new move forward as will be championed by Ellison. The millions of supporters of the real change promised by the Sanders' candidacy were largely disenfranchised by the DNC's stubborn insistence on clinging to a 'safe' course by nominating HRC. It now has been presented with the opportunity to correct this massive error of judgement and embrace a new wave of progressive activism and, in so doing, reshape the Democratic Party into an institution which more accurately reflects the will of an emerging, positive, forward thinking, and hopeful electorate.
Friday, November 4, 2016
A Final Statement and Plea Before a Election Day 2017
The fact that this election is a close contest is at once a sad testimony to the Democratic establishment's decision to steadfastly hold onto the status quo by nominating the only candidate sufficiently unpopular (if not downright hated) to actually lose to a person as vile and loathsome as Donald Trump while simultaneously an indictment of a political system in desperately dire need of a paradigm shifting change of direction. It is my fervent hope that we will survive this state of turmoil, division, and collective confusion only to reemerge at a time in the not too distant future to reclaim, reassert, and rediscover our shared and common humanity.
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Game 7, Joe Maddon and the Reinvention of Baseball
Let us all celebrate the great game of baseball as represented last night in the concluding game of the 2016 World Series. It was truly a game for the ages with so many of the outstanding aspects baseball on full display. But as we do so, let us not mistake the Cubs victory for a vindication of its 'genius' manager. Be clear that this historic victory was accomplished in spite of Joe Maddon; not because of him. The overuse of Chapman throughout the Series became evident in this final game as the closer was thoroughly extended to his physical limits while showing heroic courage to get through the 9th inning thereby allowing his team to eventually prevail. Earlier in that same inning, his manager once again asserted himself unnecessarily when he called for a safety squeeze bunt by the power hitting Baez on a 3-2 count, 1 out, and a runner on third. Predictably, the slugger missed the attempt, struck out, and retreated to the dugout shaking his head as the scoring chance was squandered. I'm wondering if Baez had been called upon to bunt at all during the course of the year, let alone in this most crucial juncture of the biggest game in the recent history of the franchise.....a classic example of a manager overreaching to the detriment of his ball club. Baez was much more likely to put the ball in play with a hard ground ball or a sacrifice fly than with a one-time-only chance at a successful bunt. Maddon seems to fashion himself as a self-styled genius of a game that often requires only that the manager step aside and let the game flow unimpeded. In brief, Joe Maddon needs to learn that the great game of baseball does not need reinvention.
Monday, October 17, 2016
The Liberal Legacy, Devolution, and A Look to the Future
I have been recently reminded that the liberal policies of the past have enacted such measures as the Social Security Administration, the desegregation of public schools, the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, the creation of Medicare, the Clear Air and Water Acts. True enough but the latter day 'liberals' have also given us NAFTA, the deregulation of the financial sector, the dismantling of aid to dependent families with children and other welfare 'reforms' which have resulted in millions of children being cast into poverty, the proliferation of mass incarceration of people for non-violent offenses and the emergence of a kind of prison industrial complex, the continuation of mass surveillance of otherwise innocent citizens, the expansion of a neo-conservative interventionist foreign policy, the invocation of the Espionage Act at an unprecedented rate to crack down on whistleblowers while discouraging dissent by procecuting investigative journalists for exposing governmental excesses, and finally (although by no means, exhaustively) the often clandestine use of drone warfare upon the innocent population in countries with whom we are not at war. The term 'liberal' has seriously devolved in recent decades baring only a scant resemblance to its once proud predecessors. FDR just took a look at the current flag bearer of the 'liberal' cause and he is not happy!
Sadly, in this election year, the alternative is a kind of maniacal neo-fascist and therefore must be repudiated but please do not mistake the default candidate as equivalent to a Henry Wallace, a Adlai Stevenson, a J or RFK, a Frank Church, a George McGovern, a Molly Ivins, a Gore Vidal, or, God help us, a MLK!! Such inspiration is to be found, not in the liberal ranks as defined by contemporary standards but rather in a new political expression brought to us by an ardent 74 year old from Vermont and certain to be sustained and expanded by an emerging vibrant young voice, singing a new song of liberation to this tired and world weary political landscape. Stay tuned...the best is yet to come.
Sadly, in this election year, the alternative is a kind of maniacal neo-fascist and therefore must be repudiated but please do not mistake the default candidate as equivalent to a Henry Wallace, a Adlai Stevenson, a J or RFK, a Frank Church, a George McGovern, a Molly Ivins, a Gore Vidal, or, God help us, a MLK!! Such inspiration is to be found, not in the liberal ranks as defined by contemporary standards but rather in a new political expression brought to us by an ardent 74 year old from Vermont and certain to be sustained and expanded by an emerging vibrant young voice, singing a new song of liberation to this tired and world weary political landscape. Stay tuned...the best is yet to come.
Saturday, October 15, 2016
Making Sense of the Inexplicable
In response to a friend's request to try to understand Trump' abiding appeal I'm afraid that applying logical constructs to the Trump campaign and the motivations of his dwindling ranks of supporters can only result in futility. His appeal, in large part, is to a base that has felt disenfranchised both culturally due to the changing demographics of the country over the past two decades and economically as a result of the decline of the manufacturing sector and its accompanying lack of well paying jobs. Trump has capitalized on this through a crude appeal to fear of the other as reflected in his extremist and rather far fetched (I mean, really...a wall?!) immigration 'policy', pronouncement that a massive tax break to the 1% will somehow magically trickle down (where have we heard that before?) to the working class, and the notion that through his (and his alone) leadership, we will return to some mythical time of past greatness...presumably, a time when women were obedient to patriarchy, people of color knew their place, and we were free to utter xenophobic and racist epithets with impunity. One can almost here the chorus of Trump supporters crying out for those bygone days of yesteryear when they were unburdened by the ugly restraints of 'political correctness' and therefore released to exercise their 'God-given' privilege in order to spread hate and vitriol wherever they damn well pleased. Trump has fostered, nurtured, and exploited this mythology at the exclusion of real policy considerations and, in so doing, has rendered his base with a visceral and distinctly anti-intellectual attraction to nothing other than his own inflated and rather grotesque public persona. Of course, we've seen all this before...the angst of a powerless segment of society used by a charismatic (although Trump's claim to this label is seriously losing credibility) leader to further his own personal ends reminds one of Mussolini's rise to power in Fascist Italy in the 1930's.
All of the above and an abiding, virulent, and irrational hatred of his opponent in this election seemingly has conspired to make an impartial judgement regarding Trump's fitness for office a matter of complete, utter, and total indifference to his most ardent supporters. I hope this helps to better understand the possible motivations of those who are casting their lot with someone who they might otherwise find wholly unacceptable and who we both suspect will wreck havoc on our already challenged country and troubled world. It gives me no pleasure to report that Trump's support like so many other considerations in this political cycle defies logic.
All of the above and an abiding, virulent, and irrational hatred of his opponent in this election seemingly has conspired to make an impartial judgement regarding Trump's fitness for office a matter of complete, utter, and total indifference to his most ardent supporters. I hope this helps to better understand the possible motivations of those who are casting their lot with someone who they might otherwise find wholly unacceptable and who we both suspect will wreck havoc on our already challenged country and troubled world. It gives me no pleasure to report that Trump's support like so many other considerations in this political cycle defies logic.
Friday, October 7, 2016
A Weekend In Paradise
Got to share with you our experience last weekend in the Bay Area...Sandwiched between two stellar concerts at the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass Festival in Golden Gate Park on Friday and Sunday were two Walnut Creek U11 victories in the Cal Cup qualifying round #2 (they won their first round match) where grandson Taiyo amassed 6 assists while controlling the games from his central midfield position. WC now advances to the regional finals on their way to their dream of a state championship.
The Hardly Strictly Bluegrass Festival is a San Francisco treasure...a three day extravaganza attracting some of the finest musician from around the country and, as the name suggests, is not limited to the bluegrass genre (although down home bluegrass can be enjoyed in abundance throughout the weekend). It offers an eclectic mix of many and varied musical styles and (get this) is entirely underwritten by the Warren Hellman Family Fund (btw: a former client of mine) for the enjoyment of an estimated 800,000 people who attend the event. Eight stages are employed simultaneously in the grassland meadows of the Park near my beloved Polo Fields.
On Friday, Debby and I got there early to get a up close spot in front of the Swan Stage where we were treated to a happy range of music beginning with the Detroit urban sound of Jessica Hernandez & The Deltas. They were followed and contrasted by the Dry Branch Fire Squad from Kentucky who played pure bluegrass from a quartet featuring incomparable guitar, mandolin, bass, and banjo virtuosity and divinely inspired harmonies. Next came an hour long tribute to the great Texas songwriter/singer, Guy Clark (who passed on earlier in the year) performed to perfection by the combined efforts of Joe Ely, Terry and Jo Harvey, Jack Ingram, and the brilliant Steve Earle. This performance took me back to the late 70's made survivable, in large part, due to the music of Guy Clark! The day/evening concluded with Dave Alvin's tribute to the late great Merle Haggard and various California songwriters. A high point came as Dave covered Brian Wilson's 'Surfer Girl' with a distinctly Bakersfield treatment! Debby and I were up and dancing for much of the final performance (some music just lifts you off your ass!).
Sunday's venue was the Rooster Stage farther up JFK Drive to the east where we positioned ourselves close up in time to catch the final songs delivered by the Texas gospel group, The Jones Family Singers, soon followed by bluegrass veterans Kane, Welch and Kaplin who survived a brief rainfall to bring us home to Appalachia in fine form. Blues legend John Hammond was next up offering a trip to the early roots of the blues from the 20's, 30's and 40's. He was followed by one of the most unusual performers I have seen in a while...Jonathan Richmond (and his drummer Tommy Larkins) who combined, variously, Flamenco guitar with stream-of-consciousness lyric to take us into the interior of his mind and to the outer reaches of what is musically possible! Suffice to say that Jonathan is way out there with, thankfully, very little chance of ever coming back! Our next performer provided a brilliant counterpoint as Rosanne Cash sang with soulful reverence the songs that at once paid tribute to her early days in Memphis and melodies that brought her commercial success later in her career. The final performance was by the irrepressible T Bone Burnett who combines driving rock and roll with uncompromising lyric which results in a transportive experience into regions otherwise not explored without his irresistible invitation. Needless to say, Debby and I were, once again, up on our feet dancing with an ungodly degree of abandon! Just a sampling of T Bone...'everyone wants peace, but nobody is willing to surrender; everyone wants forgiveness, but nobody is willing to confess'. Check him out on the sound track of last season's True Detective.
Thank you for staying with me as we toured yet another weekend in this beautiful and rather sacred patch of the planet. Hardly Strictly happens every year in the first weekend of October and you all have my personal invitation to come, as our guests, from far and near to experience it's miraculous gifts again next year.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Presidential Intelligence
Nobody has been more critical of HRC (see past postings) in terms of policy (past and present) than me but, seriously folks, please consider the alternative and the potential damage a Trump presidency could unleash upon the world. Even if one holds that Clinton somehow (by virtue of a unique calculus) is equally problematic, then simply compare each candidate's ability to grasp fundamental ideas, hold multiple thoughts simultaneously, articulate a reasoned argument, and actually listen to and retain multi-layered concepts on a wide range of issues that will require serious attention in the coming days. Elizabeth Warren relates a very telling story of the time when HRC sought out Warren's advice and expertise on a particular thorny issue. Her take away from the session was that, in spite of their many differences, HRC was by far the best student Warren had ever encountered in terms of her ability to deeply listen, retain information and then restate the various details of the concepts implicit in the instruction. This illustrates a level of intelligence hopefully most of us can agree is a necessary prerequisite for the job currently in question. If for no other reason, please compare the intellectual competency of the two applicants and soberly consider this factor when forming your final decision in November.
Thursday, August 4, 2016
Trump in Perspective
In the recent past, with each hateful, mean-spirited, factually inaccurate, or self aggrandizing statement leaving the mouth of Mr Trump, part of me wants to lash out and respond with equal amounts of venom, anger, and outrage. Lately, however, my dominant perception is focused on how much pain I see in this man's face. I suspect this anguish is a result of the deep, internal feelings of utter worthlessness all classic narcissists experience when encountering the void at the center of their being. Unfortunately, this inner malaise has now been turned outward onto the world and becomes the responsibility of the larger community to help remedy.
So when you turn to the ballot box this Fall hopefully to repudiate the ugliness that has been unleashed upon the country and the world, please also remember, with compassion, the wounded psyche and soul of the fellow human being you are most ardently rejecting as a potential leader.
So when you turn to the ballot box this Fall hopefully to repudiate the ugliness that has been unleashed upon the country and the world, please also remember, with compassion, the wounded psyche and soul of the fellow human being you are most ardently rejecting as a potential leader.
Play It a Bit Less, Uncle Sam
Some one asked me the other day if I thought it was a good idea to play the national anthem at all sporting event. My considered reply is that I would love to hear our beloved fight song only when an American team is playing in an international event...on an occasion when the team is to be distinguished from its opponent by virtue of nationality. Otherwise, it might be mistaken as a bit of jingoistic overreach ...I mean, when the Giants play the Dodgers I think we all have a pretty good idea that each team hails from the United States. Honoring individual nations at an international venue by playing each national anthem often results in a very stirring and dramatic moment. The emotional impact of the anthem increases in proportion to the frequency with which it is rendered. Most first-world countries are sufficiently secure with their sense of national identity and do not require incessant recitations of their national tune to otherwise rouse their patriotism.
More on Mr. Kaine
God help me, I know that I'll burn in hell at even higher temperature than I've already been assigned for saying this but I'm pretty sure that Tim Kaine still wears, when no one is looking of course, that tight fitting beanie with the propeller on top. I also suspect that he still shoots marbles, is inordinately proud of that special steelie in his collection, attaches playing cards to his bicycle spokes, and regularly can be heard uttering the phrases: 'golly gee', 'gee willickers', and 'gee Mrs. Cleaver, that would be swell'.
God bless him for retaining that youthful aura. Meanwhile, I'm now certain to burn to a crisp!
God bless him for retaining that youthful aura. Meanwhile, I'm now certain to burn to a crisp!
Obama's Speech
Whatever one's political persuasion, only a hopelessly embittered cynic could deny that President Obama's speech at the Democratic Convention was a beautiful piece of oration which underscored the unity of all Americans under the banner of common values.
HRC will be well advised to employ the talents of the outgoing incumbent on her behalf throughout the remainder of this campaign. His ability to rally the middle of the political spectrum was nothing short of brilliant...she is extremely lucky to have this resource at her disposal.
HRC will be well advised to employ the talents of the outgoing incumbent on her behalf throughout the remainder of this campaign. His ability to rally the middle of the political spectrum was nothing short of brilliant...she is extremely lucky to have this resource at her disposal.
Monday, July 25, 2016
Tim Kaine
The selection of Tim Kaine is actually a fairly honest reflection of where the Democratic establishment stands in terms of being progressive...they are not!! Readers of this space were alerted to this repeatedly for at least the past year.
Kaine is the safe choice...the person most acceptable to and consistent with the orthodoxy of the party's establishment. With his engaging personality, centrist positions, and an ability to speak fluent Spanish, he promises to be an effective speaker on the campaign trail and to provide a kind of accessible antidote to his often distant and guarded running mate. That said, Hillary has also rather arrogantly assumed that the millions of citizens dedicated to the principles set forth in the Sanders campaign will now follow with servile (loved Cruz's use of this term the other night) obedience in line with the Clinton ranks. She continues to either ignore the reality of the changing political landscape before her or simply dismisses it as irrelevant to her immediate political aspirations. Allow me to suggest that she would be making a mistake to do so on both counts.
Kaine is the safe choice...the person most acceptable to and consistent with the orthodoxy of the party's establishment. With his engaging personality, centrist positions, and an ability to speak fluent Spanish, he promises to be an effective speaker on the campaign trail and to provide a kind of accessible antidote to his often distant and guarded running mate. That said, Hillary has also rather arrogantly assumed that the millions of citizens dedicated to the principles set forth in the Sanders campaign will now follow with servile (loved Cruz's use of this term the other night) obedience in line with the Clinton ranks. She continues to either ignore the reality of the changing political landscape before her or simply dismisses it as irrelevant to her immediate political aspirations. Allow me to suggest that she would be making a mistake to do so on both counts.
Sunday, July 24, 2016
That Which Matters
Okay, let's try this again...all lives will never matter until black lives also matter. For those more mathematically inclined, allow me to put it this way: Black lives that matter is a sub-set of all lives that matter...the larger whole has no meaning without the presence of all its component parts.
Our Beloved Warriors and the 2015-16 Season
In the wake of our beloved Warriors' monumental collapse in the final three games of the championship series and the agonizing ensuing days of untold personal trauma as I struggled to accept the reality of this catastrophe, let's now emerge with a degree of clarity.
In spite of a disappointing final three games, Stephan Curry is still rightfully the league's MVP. A 30 point scoring average over an 82 game season where he played only an average of approximately 3/4 of a game, led his team to the winningest record in NBA history, set an all-time record for 3 point shots by making over 400 of them (breaking his own record by well over 100), and, in the process, almost single handedly transformed how the modern game is to be played in the coming days clearly distinguishes him as the league's best player. I won't attempt to excuse his lackluster performance in the final games because I know that he would never do so himself but it is also a fact that Curry played with significant knee, ankle, and elbow injuries throughout the post season. The fact that he was selected the league's MVP by the first unanimous vote in the history of the league speaks volumes for itself.
Make no mistake...Lebron James was simply magnificent down the stretch in all facets of the game (his clutch block of Andre Igudala's will live on in NBA lore for years to come). He was clearly the MVP of the Finals. A sober evaluation of the season as a whole, however, will reveal that the Warriors' and Curry's accomplishments in the 2015-16 season were truly historic. All hail!!
In spite of a disappointing final three games, Stephan Curry is still rightfully the league's MVP. A 30 point scoring average over an 82 game season where he played only an average of approximately 3/4 of a game, led his team to the winningest record in NBA history, set an all-time record for 3 point shots by making over 400 of them (breaking his own record by well over 100), and, in the process, almost single handedly transformed how the modern game is to be played in the coming days clearly distinguishes him as the league's best player. I won't attempt to excuse his lackluster performance in the final games because I know that he would never do so himself but it is also a fact that Curry played with significant knee, ankle, and elbow injuries throughout the post season. The fact that he was selected the league's MVP by the first unanimous vote in the history of the league speaks volumes for itself.
Make no mistake...Lebron James was simply magnificent down the stretch in all facets of the game (his clutch block of Andre Igudala's will live on in NBA lore for years to come). He was clearly the MVP of the Finals. A sober evaluation of the season as a whole, however, will reveal that the Warriors' and Curry's accomplishments in the 2015-16 season were truly historic. All hail!!
In Response to Orlando and Gun Violence
Of all the opinions being proffered in the days following the tragedy in Orlando and during the ensuing discussion on gun violence, the one that stands alone in terms of sheer myopia is the notion that the best solution to curbing gun violence is allowing more people to have guns. The 'logic' goes something like this: If more guns are available, then more people will be able to properly defend themselves in the event of a potential mass shooting. This line of 'reasoning' does not take into account the perennial danger posed by having an armed population roaming the streets under the influence of untold amounts of internal disorders and external additives 24/7. Let's put it another way: fire fighters arrive at the scene of a conflagration and immediately bring out the high pressured hoses to extinguish the blaze only to have the civilian 'chief' intervene by suggesting that the only way to confront the raging fire in front of them is to apply large qualities of gasoline to it! Ask any clear thinking police officer if he thinks that his job will be made easier by indiscriminately arming the general population with more weaponry! Call me a hopeless optimist but I have to think that we, with the proper application of our collective intelligence, can at least improve upon this particular thought pattern.
A Tribute to Daniel Berrigan
It's time for a brief tribute to the great American peace activist, poet, and human rights advocate, Father Daniel Berrigan who died recently at the age of 94. Remembered by many as one of the Cantonville Nine who were prosecuted for the theft and eventual destruction of draft board files (using napalm as the igniting fluid) in protest of the Vietnam War, he also was a prolific writer, a lifelong organizer, and a relentless champion for those who were denied their basic human rights and dignity by repressive regimes throughout the world. His life can be properly viewed as an ongoing resistance to the forces of death and destruction while embodying the principles of peace, compassion, and reconciliation in word and in deed. He provided a living example of a mode of being dedicated to finding, and indeed implementing, an alternative to reactive violence in response to provocation and thereby modeled a revolutionary option in the of pursuit conflict resolution. Together with his brother, Phillip, who preceded him in death in 2002, Daniel Berrigan provided a beacon of hope to a world often lost in the fog of war, misplaced values, and confusion. Rest in peace, gentle soul.
Reflections on Macbeth
Just saw the Berkeley Repertory Theatre's production of Macbeth with the excellent Conleth Hill in the title role, long time Rep contributor, James Carpenter, as King Duncan, and the incomparable Frances McDormand as Lady Macbeth. Front row seats afforded an intimate connection with the actors as they drew us into this epic tale of blind ambition, supernatural machinations, murderous betrayal, the descent into madness, and the inevitable undoing of the protagonists.
Hill's performance rendered this Macbeth at once heroically tragic and eminently accessible to the audience. His encounter with the specter of the murdered Banquo in the banquet scene was as brilliant as was his final 'life, full of sound and fury; signifying nothing' soliloquy.
McDormand was mesmerizing throughout, beginning in the opening scene as one of the witches who casts the ominous spell from 'the seeds of time'. She then thoroughly enthralled as both the ambitious and manipulative spouse of her accursed partner as well as the tormented co-conspirator who sinks slowly into madness. She exquisitely rendered the sleep walking scene with delicate nuance and stunning believability. It was an honor to witness this artist in all her glory from such a close perspective.
Of course, the other player on the stage was Shakespeare himself as we were taken on a lyrical journey into another time and then, by the sheer power and beauty of the language, transported beyond the limits of time and space into a place where the artist somehow manages to unite us all in the embrace of our common humanity.
Hill's performance rendered this Macbeth at once heroically tragic and eminently accessible to the audience. His encounter with the specter of the murdered Banquo in the banquet scene was as brilliant as was his final 'life, full of sound and fury; signifying nothing' soliloquy.
McDormand was mesmerizing throughout, beginning in the opening scene as one of the witches who casts the ominous spell from 'the seeds of time'. She then thoroughly enthralled as both the ambitious and manipulative spouse of her accursed partner as well as the tormented co-conspirator who sinks slowly into madness. She exquisitely rendered the sleep walking scene with delicate nuance and stunning believability. It was an honor to witness this artist in all her glory from such a close perspective.
Of course, the other player on the stage was Shakespeare himself as we were taken on a lyrical journey into another time and then, by the sheer power and beauty of the language, transported beyond the limits of time and space into a place where the artist somehow manages to unite us all in the embrace of our common humanity.
Sanders vs the Democratic Establishment
In response to Van Jones' dialogue with party operative, David Axelrod regarding Bernie Sanders' recent victory in the Indiana primary....Should we be surprised that the apologists for the status quo (Axelrod being a leader of this band) continue in their efforts to minimize and downplay the significance of the Sanders candidacy?! Instead of embracing the emerging movement of which Sanders is reflective, they regard it as a threat to their existence (with some justification) thereby identifying themselves as out of touch with the reality of a powerful alternative voice. They do so at their own peril because the movement is not going away. On the contrary, it will only continue to grow in the ensuing years...either within a traditional structure (looking less likely) or as a new independent party, ready and willing to include all like-minded people within its ranks.
CNN is fond of parading a cadre of Democratic elites and loyalists (Axelrod, Begala, Brazil, Borgia, et al) to defend and support (with varying degrees of nuance) the status quo. The collective critique of Sanders' candidacy often is reductive to a condescending lecture on the political impracticality of real progressive change. This is often effected with a metaphorical pat on the head and a not-so-gentle suggestion that the Sanders people take their proper place at the children's table. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party forges ahead (with the appointed Clinton at the helm) with their neoliberal domestic agenda and the continuation of a neoconservative foreign policy which includes the criminal use of drone warfare, extra-judicial assassination, mass surveillance of millions of innocent citizens, and an ongoing policy of regime change as the centerpieces of their vision for America's future. While Mr. Axelrod and Ms. Brazil might give eloquent lip service to the contrary, make no mistake as to where their loyalties lie and where their influence is likely to lead us.
CNN is fond of parading a cadre of Democratic elites and loyalists (Axelrod, Begala, Brazil, Borgia, et al) to defend and support (with varying degrees of nuance) the status quo. The collective critique of Sanders' candidacy often is reductive to a condescending lecture on the political impracticality of real progressive change. This is often effected with a metaphorical pat on the head and a not-so-gentle suggestion that the Sanders people take their proper place at the children's table. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party forges ahead (with the appointed Clinton at the helm) with their neoliberal domestic agenda and the continuation of a neoconservative foreign policy which includes the criminal use of drone warfare, extra-judicial assassination, mass surveillance of millions of innocent citizens, and an ongoing policy of regime change as the centerpieces of their vision for America's future. While Mr. Axelrod and Ms. Brazil might give eloquent lip service to the contrary, make no mistake as to where their loyalties lie and where their influence is likely to lead us.
Putting HRC in Her Proper Progressive Place
This will be painfully obvious to most discerning observers but I need to dispel any remaining thought regarding Hillary (or as my wife, Debby, refers to her: 'He He') as some sort of political progressive.
Beginning with her early affiliation with Barry Goldwater and despite her excellent work with the Children's Defense Fund, Hillary has been anything but a progressive political figure. In the mid-90's, her support of Bubba's so called welfare reform initiatives which imposed punitive mandates on those on the lowest economic rung of society, criminal justice measures which increased mandatory minimum sentencing, the continuation of Reagan's neoliberal free trade philosophy with her support of NAFTA and, further, to the whole-sale deregulation of the banking system which, in turn, moved investment from the real economy of goods and services into the netherworld of a financial sector that makes Vegas look like a children's playground signaled anything but progressive inclinations.
Moving into the brave new world of the 21st century, Hillary moved ever rightward by embracing the neoconservative policies of the Bush/Chaney Regime through her lock-step support of the Patriot Act, support (as senator) of the dubious decision to invade Iraq, her approval of expanded warrantless surveillance of millions of otherwise innocent American citizens, her support of increased penalties for whistle blowers, and her acceptance of the increased invocation of the Espionage Act in order to persecute journalists and suppress real investigative reporting. Add to this less-than-impressive array of political choices, her performance on behalf of the Obama Administration as Secretary of State provides further evidence of her center-right leanings. Her neoconservative credentials were once again put on display with her active involvement in the violent overthrow of the democratically elected government in Honduras, the destabilizing regime change in Libya, and the earlier removal of President Artiste in Haiti. During her continuing tenure as Madam Secretary, she managed to up the ante by not only actively supporting the Illegal drone attacks in Yemen but also by orchestrating a cover up wherein President Sala would claim responsibility for the attacks with the implicit guarantee of additional funds to conduct his own battle against domestic opposition. I could go on but I'm reasonably confident that you are beginning to get the idea!
Like Clinton the Lesser and Obama before her, Hillary embodies the essence of the Democratic Party's character as symbol over substance; rhetoric over actual policy. Her continued support and implementation of neo-liberal economic as well as neo-conservative interventionist policies that have been the real hallmark a new model of the Democratic Party is a far cry from the progressivism of the Roosevelt and, to a lesser extent, Truman years.
The good news (at least to an ever growing number of us) is that, for the first time in decades, the Democratic Party has an opportunity to redefine itself and move in a truly new direction; away from the old tired policies of recent decades which have moved it to a place heretofore occupied, in so many ways, by the opposing Party. Sadly, Ms. Clinton, in deed if not in word, represents a philosophy distinctly at odds with the progressive renewal currently underway.
Beginning with her early affiliation with Barry Goldwater and despite her excellent work with the Children's Defense Fund, Hillary has been anything but a progressive political figure. In the mid-90's, her support of Bubba's so called welfare reform initiatives which imposed punitive mandates on those on the lowest economic rung of society, criminal justice measures which increased mandatory minimum sentencing, the continuation of Reagan's neoliberal free trade philosophy with her support of NAFTA and, further, to the whole-sale deregulation of the banking system which, in turn, moved investment from the real economy of goods and services into the netherworld of a financial sector that makes Vegas look like a children's playground signaled anything but progressive inclinations.
Moving into the brave new world of the 21st century, Hillary moved ever rightward by embracing the neoconservative policies of the Bush/Chaney Regime through her lock-step support of the Patriot Act, support (as senator) of the dubious decision to invade Iraq, her approval of expanded warrantless surveillance of millions of otherwise innocent American citizens, her support of increased penalties for whistle blowers, and her acceptance of the increased invocation of the Espionage Act in order to persecute journalists and suppress real investigative reporting. Add to this less-than-impressive array of political choices, her performance on behalf of the Obama Administration as Secretary of State provides further evidence of her center-right leanings. Her neoconservative credentials were once again put on display with her active involvement in the violent overthrow of the democratically elected government in Honduras, the destabilizing regime change in Libya, and the earlier removal of President Artiste in Haiti. During her continuing tenure as Madam Secretary, she managed to up the ante by not only actively supporting the Illegal drone attacks in Yemen but also by orchestrating a cover up wherein President Sala would claim responsibility for the attacks with the implicit guarantee of additional funds to conduct his own battle against domestic opposition. I could go on but I'm reasonably confident that you are beginning to get the idea!
Like Clinton the Lesser and Obama before her, Hillary embodies the essence of the Democratic Party's character as symbol over substance; rhetoric over actual policy. Her continued support and implementation of neo-liberal economic as well as neo-conservative interventionist policies that have been the real hallmark a new model of the Democratic Party is a far cry from the progressivism of the Roosevelt and, to a lesser extent, Truman years.
The good news (at least to an ever growing number of us) is that, for the first time in decades, the Democratic Party has an opportunity to redefine itself and move in a truly new direction; away from the old tired policies of recent decades which have moved it to a place heretofore occupied, in so many ways, by the opposing Party. Sadly, Ms. Clinton, in deed if not in word, represents a philosophy distinctly at odds with the progressive renewal currently underway.
On Bob Manford and the Proposed Rule Changes in Baseball
Among other things, Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred is reportedly considering limiting the number of timeouts that can be called during the course of any given contest in order to 'speed up' the game. It was bad enough that the dreaded designated hitter rule was seriously being contemplated to become a regular feature in the National League but now the element of time in baseball is under official scrutiny.
One of the distinguishing characteristics of this great game of ours is its relationship to the concept of time...in baseball it hangs suspended until all twenty seven outs are recorded. When at the yard, you will not find a shot clock or a two minute warning. Instead, one will be introduced to an environment wherein a game can theoretically last forever. It is precisely this timeless element that separates baseball from its inferior rivals and is why we are proud to call it our national pastime...it remains, literally, past the constraints of mechanical time.
The heresy of imposing a limit to the amount of timeouts is to miss the point regarding these seemingly 'dead' moments in the game. Much of the charm, appeal, and majesty of the game revolves around the various strategic machinations employed by managers, players, and coaches alike. There is no limit to the myriad of occasions where strategy will need to be discussed. In order to accommodate this need, a limitless system of timeouts is essential to the smooth internal functioning of the game. Baseball is a glorious display of athleticism but it is equally a cerebral undertaking requiring moments of reflection, collaboration, and contemplation. Timeouts are vital to this process and to the successful enactment of the complete game of baseball in all of its glory. Please, Mr. Commissioner...don't tempt fate by interfering with perfection!
One of the distinguishing characteristics of this great game of ours is its relationship to the concept of time...in baseball it hangs suspended until all twenty seven outs are recorded. When at the yard, you will not find a shot clock or a two minute warning. Instead, one will be introduced to an environment wherein a game can theoretically last forever. It is precisely this timeless element that separates baseball from its inferior rivals and is why we are proud to call it our national pastime...it remains, literally, past the constraints of mechanical time.
The heresy of imposing a limit to the amount of timeouts is to miss the point regarding these seemingly 'dead' moments in the game. Much of the charm, appeal, and majesty of the game revolves around the various strategic machinations employed by managers, players, and coaches alike. There is no limit to the myriad of occasions where strategy will need to be discussed. In order to accommodate this need, a limitless system of timeouts is essential to the smooth internal functioning of the game. Baseball is a glorious display of athleticism but it is equally a cerebral undertaking requiring moments of reflection, collaboration, and contemplation. Timeouts are vital to this process and to the successful enactment of the complete game of baseball in all of its glory. Please, Mr. Commissioner...don't tempt fate by interfering with perfection!
The MSM and the Vote Count
Sorry folks but it's time for some additional venting!...Please someone (okay, I will) tell the MSM that the Democratic super delegates are officially uncommitted and therefore are not firmly in the possession of either candidate. In their apparent eagerness to ordain Ms. Clinton as the standard bearer of the Party, our friends at the major networks (MSNBC being the most galling!) insist upon listing the count as inclusive of the yet to be pledged super delegates. This is not only a misrepresentation of the facts but also potentially manipulative in terms of discouraging prospective voters in future primaries from coming to the polls thinking that the election is all but decided and their voting is therefore a meaningless exercise. Fortunately, the Sanders supporters have largely ignored the pronouncements from MSM and continue to defy the 'experts' by coming out in droves to will their candidate to one upset victory after the other. Unlike the pundit class, the people realize and are making it abundantly clear that this election is not over!!
Hillary's Tactic in an Early Democratic Debate
A quick follow up to the Democratic debate a couple of nights ago...As is her inclination, Hillary once again used the occasion to mischaracterize Bernie's positions, this time on the issue of the bail out of the auto industry. As George Zornick explains in a recent article in The Nation, Sanders' vote on the allocation of TARP funds, which only partially were to be directed to the auto industry, was motivated by his mistrust regarding the enforcement of measures designed to punish wayward fund managers. In this instance, the bail out of the auto industry was inseparable from the larger issue of the Wall St. relief effort, a proposition that inspired understandable skepticism. What Clinton intentionally neglected to point out was Sanders' wholehearted support of the 2008 bill which provided unambiguous and direct support to the auto industry. This was yet another underhanded attempt to discredit her opponent by deliberately distorting the facts to gain political advantage. She might capture a small, short term benefit from such behavior but the millions of Sanders' supporters, hungry for authenticity and integrity in the political process, will not soon forget her less-than-honorable tactics.
Yet Another MSM Rant
Please indulge me as I must vent over yet another example of the MSM's morbid fascination with the Trumpster at the expense of the ill-reported surge from the Sanders' candidacy. The so-called liberal/progressive outlet, MSNBC, repeatedly presents a Sanders' speech with the sound muted as a talking head rattles on about what is believed to be the content of his talk!! On more than one occasion, the reporter broadcasts from a Sanders' rally explaining to the audience what Bernie might be saying while he is, you know, actually speaking in the inaudible background!! In one instance, similar Sanders' silencing was interrupted in order to provide live coverage of a Trump speech. Meanwhile, when covering a Trump event, this same network will often carry his speech in its entirety followed by endless commentary regarding his brashness, electability, tactical approach, or any number of personal irrelevancies.
Despite the appalling lack of in-depth coverage of the Sanders' campaign and the deliberate attempt to literally mute his message, the American people (especially among the younger demographic) continue to speak loudly by voice and small contributions to signal a sea change in how politics is to be conducted in this country. Perhaps at some point, the MSM will catch up with the will of the people and give its new voice a fair hearing.
Despite the appalling lack of in-depth coverage of the Sanders' campaign and the deliberate attempt to literally mute his message, the American people (especially among the younger demographic) continue to speak loudly by voice and small contributions to signal a sea change in how politics is to be conducted in this country. Perhaps at some point, the MSM will catch up with the will of the people and give its new voice a fair hearing.
Baseball Is Upon Us
In anticipation of a new baseball season:The sun is beginning to peek through the clouds, they've stopped playing that game with the irregular ball, and the smiles are returning to the children's faces. That's right...pitchers and catchers report to spring training today!! Once again, new hope springs eternal with the advent of yet another season of the great game of baseball!!
On Mitch McConnell
At least Mitch McConnell is consistent...when he rather unpatriotically declared that he would dedicate himself to the failed presidency of Obama (I actually remember a time when statesmen from both political parties would rally as loyal Americans around the new president knowing that, in spite of differences, we were nevertheless united as citizens of the same Union), the senator from Kentucky set sail on a course of unprecedented obstructionist positions which resulted in a kind of legislative gridlock heretofore unseen. But he has significantly upped the ante with his refusal to consider any nomination to the Supreme Court by the president thereby abdicating his constitutional duty to do so...an impeachable offense. Of course, the stakes are enormous when considering the next member to sit on the highest court in the land but our elected officials are mandated to carry out their respective duties: the president must nominate someone to fill a vacancy and the senate must give that person a fair hearing and, in good time, confirm a candidate as the next Supreme Court Judge. This is how our imperfect government works and, in the long view, provides an excellent example of how a system checks and balances helps to prevent one viewpoint becoming the sole voice of the people indefinitely.
It is laughably ironic that some of the most ardent defenders of a literal interpretation of the Constitution are also those advocating most loudly for Obama and the Senate to set aside their constitutional responsibilities. Fortunately, I am cautiously optimistic that McConnell and his like will not have the final word on this vital issue.
It is laughably ironic that some of the most ardent defenders of a literal interpretation of the Constitution are also those advocating most loudly for Obama and the Senate to set aside their constitutional responsibilities. Fortunately, I am cautiously optimistic that McConnell and his like will not have the final word on this vital issue.
Lady Gaga in America
Lady Gaga just sang the national anthem in a way it has never been sung before and all Jim Nantz can say is: 'great fly over'!! Welcome to America everyone!
I'm Not Too Old
Kindred Parker: "I'm not too old. I'm not too young. I'm right in the middle of the American experience. In my 40 years on this planet, Bernie Sanders is the only presidential hopeful ever offered who consistently represents and advocates for my beliefs and concerns. I'd actually thought it was impossible to have anyone even close to the presidency that wasn't bought by, in contemporary terms: "the 1%," and until now, it was impossible for an authentic social justice politician to bring us their message and organize the people through the corporate conglomerate media. But alas, the internet is the people's, for the time being, and for what might be a brief spell, we have the opportunity to affect the media narrative ourselves: to argue; to explore and articulate our ideas beyond the few grotesque, sound-bitten versions of ideas that are usually meant to define us; to organize and elect someone who actually represents us. Bernie Sanders is not the stuff of impossible idealism. He is neither a scary Mccarthy era Marxist monster nor a sophomoric college-aged illusion. He is simply the first candidate of our lifetime whose sole concern is to actually represent us: the American people across all income strata. After a lifetime of corporate controlled media and elections, the message and the possibility of Bernie Sanders is blowing our minds, which is so very sad because this is actually the way democracy is supposed to work. You're supposed to be able to elect someone who represents you who isn't completely full of shit. The onus is on us now to elect him. Let's not fuck this up."
Introducing Kindred Parker
It's one thing for an old campaigner like me to wax poetic about the virtues of Candidate Sanders but to hear this eloquent tribute and call to arms from a representative from that middle generation just behind us is truly inspirational. To paraphrase that guy from Hibbing again: Something is happening here and we are just now beginning to understand what it is...aren't we, Mr. Jones!! The following post is from Kindred Parker...enjoy!
In Memory of Bob Elliot
Very sad to read that Bob Elliot has passed away. He was a brilliant comedic mind who partnered with Ray Goulding to form the Bob and Ray comedy duo in the early fifties. I remember their regular appearances on the Ed Sullivan and Steve Allen shows...always perfectly dead pan in their hilarious satires. Bob's son, Chris, has carried on his father's legacy by becoming an accomplished comedic actor in his own right.
Bob Elliot's understated delivery and supreme wit will be sorely missed.
Bob Elliot's understated delivery and supreme wit will be sorely missed.
The MSM, Relections on the Political Players, and the Continuation of an American Tradition
As the main stream media gush and marvel at the latest strategic PR move from the ongoing reality show better known as the Trump Candidacy, I find myself thinking what a perfect representative The Donald is for this second Gilded Age we have been subjected to in recent years. Who better embodies the worst aspects of a system that values the blind accumulation of personal and corporate wealth while the once vibrant middle class loses economic ground and virtually disappears in the wake of this period of unbridled greed.
Many forecast Hillary as the heir apparent to the Obama/Democratic legacy but, for me, the perfect opponent for Trump will be Mr. Sanders, a candidate who offers a striking contrast to whomever the Republicans decide to offer. Hillary, like Bubba before her, will continue what I consider to be 'Republican light' policies including continued neo-liberal free trade agreements, further punitive welfare reform measures, reliance on massive corporate campaign funding, support for expansive surveillance of innocent American citizens, continued persecution of real investigative journalists, the prosecution of what Gore Vidal once declared as 'an endless war for endless peace' in response to external and internal threats, and the pursuit of a kind of liberal interventionist approach to foreign policy. Sadly, Mr. Obama has followed in line with much of the Democratic agenda thereby wasting the opportunity to effect real change. To be fair, it has not been helpful having a Congress that has been dedicated to the proposition that his term in office would be a 'failed presidency' (as Mitch McConnell famously declared upon Obama's ascension to power). Hardly fertile ground for even the most well conceived and intended aspirations.
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, will, for the first time since Henry Wallace, provide a legitimate alternative to the status quo. Just for example, his conviction that health care should be a right protected and nurtured by a government dedicated to individual needs rather than a privilege that ultimately is in service to corporate profit contrasts sharply with the positions of all other presidential hopefuls. His non-intervention philosophy with regard to foreign policy also is consistent with his vision to refocus on our domestic and internal rehabilitation rather than pursuing policies which have depleted our national treasury in deference to numerous misadventures across the globe. His insistence on campaign funding exclusively from individual small donors underscores his belief that a national political movement can be fueled entirely through an organized grass roots movement. In the area of education, he has long advocated for eliminating the crippling effects of student debt by a return to and implementation of the time honored system of free public institutions of higher learning. Finally, Sanders' emphasis on designating the public sector as a prime mover in the restoration of a viable middle class offers a clear departure from the ideologies expressed elsewhere during this election year.
Recent polls have indicated that more than half of the 18 to 25 age group of Americans have a favorable attitude regarding the kind of democratic socialism Sanders is advocating, a reoccurring sentiment that has deep roots in the history of American politics. As Mr. Dylan proclaimed some time ago...'your old road is rapidly fading; get out of the new one if you can't lend a hand for the times they are (finally) a changin'! The old guard is failing; the system is broken; the dinosaur is staggering and its flailing tail is wreaking considerable havoc but a new day is on the horizon and a new generation of forward thinking Americans is emerging from the wreckage to point the way to a reinvigorated tomorrow. And some of us old timers are coming along for the ride!
Many forecast Hillary as the heir apparent to the Obama/Democratic legacy but, for me, the perfect opponent for Trump will be Mr. Sanders, a candidate who offers a striking contrast to whomever the Republicans decide to offer. Hillary, like Bubba before her, will continue what I consider to be 'Republican light' policies including continued neo-liberal free trade agreements, further punitive welfare reform measures, reliance on massive corporate campaign funding, support for expansive surveillance of innocent American citizens, continued persecution of real investigative journalists, the prosecution of what Gore Vidal once declared as 'an endless war for endless peace' in response to external and internal threats, and the pursuit of a kind of liberal interventionist approach to foreign policy. Sadly, Mr. Obama has followed in line with much of the Democratic agenda thereby wasting the opportunity to effect real change. To be fair, it has not been helpful having a Congress that has been dedicated to the proposition that his term in office would be a 'failed presidency' (as Mitch McConnell famously declared upon Obama's ascension to power). Hardly fertile ground for even the most well conceived and intended aspirations.
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, will, for the first time since Henry Wallace, provide a legitimate alternative to the status quo. Just for example, his conviction that health care should be a right protected and nurtured by a government dedicated to individual needs rather than a privilege that ultimately is in service to corporate profit contrasts sharply with the positions of all other presidential hopefuls. His non-intervention philosophy with regard to foreign policy also is consistent with his vision to refocus on our domestic and internal rehabilitation rather than pursuing policies which have depleted our national treasury in deference to numerous misadventures across the globe. His insistence on campaign funding exclusively from individual small donors underscores his belief that a national political movement can be fueled entirely through an organized grass roots movement. In the area of education, he has long advocated for eliminating the crippling effects of student debt by a return to and implementation of the time honored system of free public institutions of higher learning. Finally, Sanders' emphasis on designating the public sector as a prime mover in the restoration of a viable middle class offers a clear departure from the ideologies expressed elsewhere during this election year.
Recent polls have indicated that more than half of the 18 to 25 age group of Americans have a favorable attitude regarding the kind of democratic socialism Sanders is advocating, a reoccurring sentiment that has deep roots in the history of American politics. As Mr. Dylan proclaimed some time ago...'your old road is rapidly fading; get out of the new one if you can't lend a hand for the times they are (finally) a changin'! The old guard is failing; the system is broken; the dinosaur is staggering and its flailing tail is wreaking considerable havoc but a new day is on the horizon and a new generation of forward thinking Americans is emerging from the wreckage to point the way to a reinvigorated tomorrow. And some of us old timers are coming along for the ride!
Masters of War
Old men in soft chairs conspire to create, either by the direct implementation of a new course of action or in reaction to the blowback incurred as a result of previous policy decisions, the conditions (often under false pretenses) in which young men and women are sent into harm's way only to return from the horrors of war with life-long disabilities, visible and unseen. These same politicians create a mythology in which the deadly realities of war are romanticized under the cloak of slogans and imagined visions of heroic victory and noble endeavor. Meanwhile, those who have become victimized, traumatized, and otherwise altered by their experience are, in far too many cases, also abandoned and ignored as they attempt to re-assimilate with society. In a cruel irony, the originators of the policy that has damaged so many lives callously use the plight of these wounded souls in an attempt to curry additional political favor in order to be placed in high office where they are certain to create the same deadly conditions which produced so much suffering in the first place. This circular and cynical dance has repeated itself for far too long...the chain must be broken...the lives of those made to pay its ugly price must finally be properly honored. As for the old men and sadly some women as well who spend their time dreaming their deadly dreams, I will turn to one of my favorite poets who said just the other day (or so it seems)....'like Judas of old, you lie and deceive; a world war can be won, you want me to believe; but I see through your eyes and I see through your brain; like I see through the water that runs down my drain.' And don't let the door hit you as you leave the room!
A Memorial Day Reflection
Let us remember and grieve all the victims of misanthropy in general and war in particular...civilian and soldier alike. Let us honor this occasion by accessing the better part of ourselves in order to imagine and create a world in which conflict and difference will be resolved by peaceful means. Let us join with the likes of Gandhi and Martin Luther King by embodying in ourselves the change we wish to make manifest in the world.
Giants Baseball 2010
The recipe for baseball success is really quite simple: add a large portion of great pitching, a healthy dose of fantastic defense, blend in an assortment of timiely hitting and then season liberally with team chemistry...let simmer for an entire 162 game schedule plus 11 post season victories and then serve to an entire famished community who has waited 52 years for THE WORLD CHAMPION SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS!!!!!!
Additional Reflections on MLK, RFK, and John Lennon
I find myself reflecting, once again, on Martin Luther King's revolutionary and radical ideas of answering the corrosive presence of hate and warfare with the restorative, godly inspired application of love and the peaceful embrace of brotherhood. For him, this was not an unachievable ideal or abstract concept but rather an active mandate of global proportions. His vision pointed the way for a significant paradigm shift away from the self interested accumulation of power and resources and toward the realization of a world in which the fellowship of humankind would become a global priority. He saw this change as being in keeping not only with God's will but also consistent with the fundamental core values of this great nation.
While reflecting on some of MLK's essential ideas as a uniquely spiritual leader, I also was seized with sadness over the loss of two other significant voices for radical change: Robert F Kennedy and John Lennon. The former was in a position of political influence sufficient to accomplish many of the lofty goals set forth by Martin's eloquent and inspired rhetoric while the latter provided the artistic vision and popularity to influence an entire generation to seek new answers to old problems and to value the common good of all humanity over the narrow interests of the very few. Sadly these voices have been silenced (a topic for another day) but the legacy of their message remains as a beacon for all who envision a more equitable, sustainable, and hopeful future.
While reflecting on some of MLK's essential ideas as a uniquely spiritual leader, I also was seized with sadness over the loss of two other significant voices for radical change: Robert F Kennedy and John Lennon. The former was in a position of political influence sufficient to accomplish many of the lofty goals set forth by Martin's eloquent and inspired rhetoric while the latter provided the artistic vision and popularity to influence an entire generation to seek new answers to old problems and to value the common good of all humanity over the narrow interests of the very few. Sadly these voices have been silenced (a topic for another day) but the legacy of their message remains as a beacon for all who envision a more equitable, sustainable, and hopeful future.
Red Tape Madness!
He's one for the critics of big government and slow-moving bureaucratic systems:
After my knee surgery well over a month ago, I immediately applied for a temporary disabled permit for my vehicle. Yesterday, I received a notice from DMV that my application must be resubmitted due to a procedural error...As requested, I listed my full name as normally stated; not as the required last name first then first and middle. The entire two page application was completed perfectly including a signed testimony from my doctor but because the order of name listing was not in compliance with the rules, the application was denied and the process must now be repeated. Is there no one at DMV that could sort this out, could simply rearrange the name placement?! After all, my full name (in correct order) has been in your files since I entered your system in 1963!!
I will be off crutches next Monday and will then be taking my first steps so the need for the permit will have passed by the time a new document can be obtained. Really could have used that permit on Friday and Saturday when I crutched many long blocks to various venues ( traffic and time considerations prevented a drop off). While it's true that the exercise was of some benefit, I still would have appreciated the chance to park by the front door! Thanks, DMV for your diligence in adhering to the exact letter of the law when the insertion of some good old fashioned commonsense could have saved at least one taxpayer a considerable amount of grief!
After my knee surgery well over a month ago, I immediately applied for a temporary disabled permit for my vehicle. Yesterday, I received a notice from DMV that my application must be resubmitted due to a procedural error...As requested, I listed my full name as normally stated; not as the required last name first then first and middle. The entire two page application was completed perfectly including a signed testimony from my doctor but because the order of name listing was not in compliance with the rules, the application was denied and the process must now be repeated. Is there no one at DMV that could sort this out, could simply rearrange the name placement?! After all, my full name (in correct order) has been in your files since I entered your system in 1963!!
I will be off crutches next Monday and will then be taking my first steps so the need for the permit will have passed by the time a new document can be obtained. Really could have used that permit on Friday and Saturday when I crutched many long blocks to various venues ( traffic and time considerations prevented a drop off). While it's true that the exercise was of some benefit, I still would have appreciated the chance to park by the front door! Thanks, DMV for your diligence in adhering to the exact letter of the law when the insertion of some good old fashioned commonsense could have saved at least one taxpayer a considerable amount of grief!
A Christmas Tradition and A Seasonal Wish '15
On Saturday night, we made our annual pilgrimage (this time rather slowly as I am still being propelled by crutches) to St. Ignatius Cathedral to enjoy an evening with the San Francisco based choral group, Chanticleer, as they performed their Christmas program. It was a beautiful blend of early Gregorian plain songs, reverent Medieval hymns, traditional seasonal renderings, an exquisite version of Ava Maria, unique local arrangements, and a stirring finale of Silent Night. What especially struck me about the experience was the reminder of the importance of honoring the sacred and recognizing the presence of the Devine in our lives. In the Middle Ages, regular offerings to God were commonplace, a way of life....it appears far less so in these modern times. This event was an occasion to celebrate the wonderful Christian narrative of the Devine made manifest in the world through the presence of Jesus and His promise of redemption for all humankind. I will be sure to reread Dickens' classic, A Christmas Carol, for his brilliant literary expression of this timeless theme.
Wishing you all a reverent examination of the Sacred
and the reality of the Devine in yourselves and in the souls of those within your sphere of influence as you pass through this Holiday Season and into the New Y
Wishing you all a reverent examination of the Sacred
and the reality of the Devine in yourselves and in the souls of those within your sphere of influence as you pass through this Holiday Season and into the New Y
The Presence, Application, and Preservation of Values
The Christian value of caring for the needy in a time of dire circumstance should not be subsumed by fear of 'the other'. Christian virtues should not be discarded in the wake of a frightening event. To do so would apply a similar logic that was evident after the terrorist attacks in 2001...In that case, certain vital constitutional protections (the right to privacy, protections against illegal search and seizure, and ultimately the freedom of the press) were summarily cast aside in deference to fear with enactment of the Patriot Act.
The opportunity to display Christian values and Constitutional rights is especially afforded us during moments of crisis...Our faithfulness to each set of ideals will be our legacy to future generations seeking guidance and moral direction. Perhaps they might learn also that answering hate in kind is not a sustainable solution for the future. Perhaps they will have the courage to act not with equal amounts of venomous rage, violence, and intolerance but rather to make manifest in the world the enduring values of inclusion, compassion, reconciliation, understanding, thoughtful reflection, intelligent decision making, and heartfelt consideration of their brothers and sisters worldwide when they offer themselves as a living embodiment of their stated position.
Closing our borders is a bit like shutting the front door in order to protect the family against a flu virus. The origins and continuation of terrorism have their roots in a complex set of historical realities, circumstances, policies, and responses only some of which we can control. Through the application of our fundamental American values of charity and inclusion we now have the opportunity to demonstrate to the world the better part of our national character and in so doing we might begin to heal our wounds from within.
Libertarian Insight from Early in the Campaign
I find it both interesting and ironic that it took a staunch and consistently loyal conservative such as Rand Paul to identify the similar foreign policy positions of Hillary Clinton and other Republican candidates, most notably Jeb Bush. He is to be commended for suggesting the unbroken line of thought from the Neo-cons of the Bush/Chaney Administration, the continuation and expansion of many of these policies through the Obama years, and the prospect of more of the same with a looming Clinton regime. It is also somewhat ironic that the intersection between true and traditional conservative thought as represented by Paul and the foreign policy analysis of the Democratic Socialist candidate, Bernie Sanders, continues to expand. Of course, there exists a massive gap in terms of their respective domestic policy positions...most notably regarding the current and future status of Social Security and Medicare.
I also appreciated Paul's observations regarding the imprudence of certain military options to the crisis in Syria being considered by some of the other Republican participants ...first in reaction to Christy's willingness to shoot down Russian planes in the event of establishing a no-fly zone and then, by inference, to the suggestion by both Trump and Cruz that carpet bombing Syria was a viable option in combating ISIS in particular and radical Islamic terrorism in general. May I suggest that such a course of action is not only in direct violation of international law and is universally considered to be a war crime (the very nature of a carpet bomb is to inflict random destruction and loss of life) but it most certainly will result in the massive recruitment of vengeance-seeking individuals for future terrorist attacks. As Donald Rumsfield once mused over our actions in Iraq, 'with each terrorist we kill, we create two more in their wake'.
Last night was appallingly clarifying in terms of how our would-be leaders consider the future and we can thank the likes of Rand Paul for bringing his colleagues' views into a disturbing focus.
I also appreciated Paul's observations regarding the imprudence of certain military options to the crisis in Syria being considered by some of the other Republican participants ...first in reaction to Christy's willingness to shoot down Russian planes in the event of establishing a no-fly zone and then, by inference, to the suggestion by both Trump and Cruz that carpet bombing Syria was a viable option in combating ISIS in particular and radical Islamic terrorism in general. May I suggest that such a course of action is not only in direct violation of international law and is universally considered to be a war crime (the very nature of a carpet bomb is to inflict random destruction and loss of life) but it most certainly will result in the massive recruitment of vengeance-seeking individuals for future terrorist attacks. As Donald Rumsfield once mused over our actions in Iraq, 'with each terrorist we kill, we create two more in their wake'.
Last night was appallingly clarifying in terms of how our would-be leaders consider the future and we can thank the likes of Rand Paul for bringing his colleagues' views into a disturbing focus.
Reflections on MLK
As we proceed forward together into uncertain and troubled waters, consider how different this world might have been had Martin Luther King not been cut down by the forces of hatred and ignorance so early in his brilliant life. We might have seen a world in which love would be operating as a verb...an active expression of positivity counter acting the cynicism of hate and violence; a world where patriotism and good citizenship might be measured more by compassion and care for each other than by the mere application of allegiance, obedience and acquiescence to authority. His living presence would have offered a way forward that entailed the courage to confront fear, violence and discord with intelligence, love and vision....and the wisdom to know that vengeance does not equal justice.
How fortunate we are to have his legacy of hope and promise to serve as a guide for us while we attempt to form a more perfect union and shape a better world.
How fortunate we are to have his legacy of hope and promise to serve as a guide for us while we attempt to form a more perfect union and shape a better world.
Cal vs Arizona St '15
After spotting Arizona St. a lead of 24-3 in the first half, the California Golden Bears rallied to a 48-46 victory behind a 542 yard, 5 touchdown performance by quarterback Jared Goff in what will probably be his final appearance at Memorial Stadium. After four separate lead changes in the final quarter, Matt Anderson's 26 yard field goal with 4'seconds to play provided the winning margin. Goff was masterful in guiding the Bears to 5 consecutive touchdown drives in the second half before engineering the final drive to put the team within easy field goal range. The much too generous defense of the first half found new life in the second as it thwarted almost every Sun Devil attempt at the end zone by holding them to field goals while the Bears answered with touchdowns. The defensive unit redefined the concept of 'bend but don't break' as it provided just enough resistance to allow the offense and Goff to work their magic down the stretch. As Joe Kapp famously declared some years ago, "the Bear never quits and the Bear never dies!!"
This was an epic win for a program that has seen its share of ups and downs in recent years and marks perhaps the final exclamation point on Goff's stellar career at Cal. He is almost certain to make himself available in the upcoming NFL draft as the #1 college quarterback in the nation.
With a 7-5 seasonal record, the Bears look forward to their first bowl invitation in 4 years. It was a night to remember for everyone associated with the Cal family. Roll on you Bears!!
Thursday, July 21, 2016
Past Thoughts on Bernie and Hillary/A Call for Change
I've had enough of all this 'Bernie is hurting Hillary's chances rhetoric. The principal damage being done here is the failure of Clinton to adequately connect with a significant (soon to be a majority) portion of the Democratic base which is better reflected by the Sanders' candidacy. For God's sake, what manner of convoluted logic would suggest that Sanders is somehow responsible for Clinton shortcomings!?
I completely agree with the leadership of the Democratic Party who rightly suggests that what is needed at this point in the process is to think seriously about uniting behind the candidate who best gives the Democrats the chance to defeat Donald Trump in the Fall election. Unfortunately, they're hitching their star to the wrong wagon. In every credible poll, Sanders has a significant lead over The Donald in the general election while Clinton is in a pitched battle with her numbers in serious decline over the past two months. The most recent poll has Sanders leading Trump by 13 points; Clinton clinging to a rapidly eroding 2 point margin. Much like Obama's surge during the 2008 campaign, Sanders is gaining momentum within the Party and overwhelming support from independent voters throughout the country....you know, those same people who are certain to determine the next occupant of that famous Pennsylvania Avenue address!
It's past time for the Democratic establishment to swallow deeply that wad of stubborn ideological pride and wake up not only to the practical realities of the mathematical situation as it relates to the Sander v Trump contest but also to identify and embrace a new and potentially abiding voice...the voice of real change in the way politics is to be run in the coming years and the way in which we will address ourselves and others in this rapidly evolving world. The Democrats, through the Sanders' candidacy, have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and become part of the vanguard toward a better global future and, in the process, defeat the forces which will lead us in a decidedly different direction.
Obviously, results in the California primary today will be decisive in the outcome of the election and the eventual course of the country. A Sanders victory would further his already mounting argument as the favored candidate and compel the Party leadership, in the form of the hundreds of super delegates, to seriously reconsider their choice of who will best represent them in a contest against Trump.
In the meantime, Sanders has made the most of his opportunity to influence the Democratic Party's official position by naming several prominent and forward thinking citizens to the platform committee at this summer's convention....progressive congressman (and the sole Muslim in Congress), Keith Ellison; long-time environmental activist and writer, Bill McKibbon and the renown author, scholar, commentator, and social activist, Cornel West. These outstanding Americans will offer a new voice to the process of forming policy and direction for a Party sorely lacking in innovation and vision. This group is especially welcomed in the wake of a time when their collective voice has been silenced through in attention, neglect, and downright censorship by the MSM. Bring it on brothers Ellison, McKibbon, and West!! Together with Sanders and, more importantly, the millions of Americans they represent, a promise has been made to begin forging the long road toward a more equitable and just society.
I completely agree with the leadership of the Democratic Party who rightly suggests that what is needed at this point in the process is to think seriously about uniting behind the candidate who best gives the Democrats the chance to defeat Donald Trump in the Fall election. Unfortunately, they're hitching their star to the wrong wagon. In every credible poll, Sanders has a significant lead over The Donald in the general election while Clinton is in a pitched battle with her numbers in serious decline over the past two months. The most recent poll has Sanders leading Trump by 13 points; Clinton clinging to a rapidly eroding 2 point margin. Much like Obama's surge during the 2008 campaign, Sanders is gaining momentum within the Party and overwhelming support from independent voters throughout the country....you know, those same people who are certain to determine the next occupant of that famous Pennsylvania Avenue address!
It's past time for the Democratic establishment to swallow deeply that wad of stubborn ideological pride and wake up not only to the practical realities of the mathematical situation as it relates to the Sander v Trump contest but also to identify and embrace a new and potentially abiding voice...the voice of real change in the way politics is to be run in the coming years and the way in which we will address ourselves and others in this rapidly evolving world. The Democrats, through the Sanders' candidacy, have a unique opportunity to seize the moment and become part of the vanguard toward a better global future and, in the process, defeat the forces which will lead us in a decidedly different direction.
Obviously, results in the California primary today will be decisive in the outcome of the election and the eventual course of the country. A Sanders victory would further his already mounting argument as the favored candidate and compel the Party leadership, in the form of the hundreds of super delegates, to seriously reconsider their choice of who will best represent them in a contest against Trump.
In the meantime, Sanders has made the most of his opportunity to influence the Democratic Party's official position by naming several prominent and forward thinking citizens to the platform committee at this summer's convention....progressive congressman (and the sole Muslim in Congress), Keith Ellison; long-time environmental activist and writer, Bill McKibbon and the renown author, scholar, commentator, and social activist, Cornel West. These outstanding Americans will offer a new voice to the process of forming policy and direction for a Party sorely lacking in innovation and vision. This group is especially welcomed in the wake of a time when their collective voice has been silenced through in attention, neglect, and downright censorship by the MSM. Bring it on brothers Ellison, McKibbon, and West!! Together with Sanders and, more importantly, the millions of Americans they represent, a promise has been made to begin forging the long road toward a more equitable and just society.
Statement of Purpose
Welcome to Bob's Mixed Bag. The intention in creating this site is to share my thoughts, impressions, and feelings regarding a rather wide range of topics and issues as they have presented themselves in the past, are currently revealed, and how they might appear and impact future scenarios. On any given day, the reader might discover a piece on the current political scene, a heartfelt reminiscence of Secretariat's spell binding Triple Crown winning run in the 1973 Belmont Stakes, a lyrical journey through times past in San Francisco's bohemian North Beach, a musing regarding individual and collective spiritual aspirations, or perhaps an in-depth analysis of the local baseball team's prospects for the upcoming season. It is also hoped that these offerings , while incisive and sometimes pointed, will also implicitly contain and embody a prevailing sense of inclusive kindness, more than occasional humor, and a genuine desire to share; not as an expression of simple sentiment but rather as an ongoing example of perhaps a more preferred manner of communication. My success may be ultimately judged by reference to the degree to which I have imbued the succeeding scribbles with this set of values.
Allow me to thank you in advance for your interest and participation in this endeavor. It is both my hope and desire that you enjoy and benefit from the experience.
Allow me to thank you in advance for your interest and participation in this endeavor. It is both my hope and desire that you enjoy and benefit from the experience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)